Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added include for SiStripApvGain to SiStripGainsPCLHarvester.h #21525

Conversation

Teemperor
Copy link
Contributor

We reference SiStripApvGain but in this header, so we also
need to include the associated header to make this file
parsable on its own.

We reference SiStripApvGain but in this header, so we also
need to include the associated header to make this file
parsable on its own.
@Teemperor
Copy link
Contributor Author

Part of the work going on regarding the C++ modules migration of CMSSW (tracked as issue #15248). This PR is not meant to refactor things, but just to make these headers compile.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21525/2286

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Teemperor (Raphael Isemann) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @gbenelli, @tocheng, @jlagram, @OlivierBondu, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ghellwig
Copy link

please test

@ghellwig
Copy link

+1
provided jenkins agrees

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24920/console Started: 2017/12/03 14:22

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21525/24920/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21525/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017+NANOMERGE

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2835085
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2834906
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 178
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.40000000001 KiB( 23 files compared)
  • Checked 114 log files, 10 edm output root files, 27 DQM output files

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 37cc468 into cms-sw:master Dec 4, 2017
@Teemperor Teemperor deleted the IncludeSistripapvgainSistripgainspclharvesterh branch December 19, 2017 08:47
@Teemperor Teemperor restored the IncludeSistripapvgainSistripgainspclharvesterh branch December 19, 2017 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants