New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace boost::array with std::array #21543
Replace boost::array with std::array #21543
Conversation
Part of the work going on regarding the C++ modules migration of CMSSW (tracked as issue #15248). This PR is not meant to refactor things, but just to make these headers compile. |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
A new Pull Request was created by @Teemperor (Raphael Isemann) for master. It involves the following packages: CondFormats/HcalObjects @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
@Teemperor I know that this is not the scope of this PR, but couldn't we use this opportunity to migrate the |
Comparison is ready There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Comparison Summary:
|
@Teemperor ping |
ae3a9e9
to
c4e6f74
Compare
+1 |
+code-checks |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
merge |
@Teemperor I believe, it would be good for the release notes, if you changed the title of this PR back to the original one. |
No description provided.