fixing bug in CaloObjFiltering for HLT when the object has no geometry: 100X backport

[Sam-Harper]

This is the 10_0_X backport of #22116

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for CMSSW_10_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers

@Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@battibass, @jainshilpi, @lgray, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @drkovalskyi, @varuns23, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[Martin-Grunewald]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25904/console Started: 2018/02/05 16:08

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 3064097
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22117/25904/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22117/25904/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-22117/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2468773
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2468603
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.28000000004 KiB( 22 files compared)
• Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1