New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial commit for new PF threshold DB object #22346
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-22346/3563 |
A new Pull Request was created by @argiro for master. It involves the following packages: CondCore/EcalPlugins @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
<test name="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test.sh"/> | ||
<test name="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test.sh"/> | ||
<test name="EcalADCToGeV_update_test" command="EcalADCToGeV_update_test.sh"/> | ||
<test name="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test" command="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test.sh"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ggovi , was this removal of tests on purpose?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smuzaffar thanks a lot to spot this!!
@argiro please restore the tests, we are relying on these tests for the production O2Os = VERY CRITICAL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
the removal was probably unintentional, but not critical ..
… On 28 Feb 2018, at 14:15, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
@smuzaffar commented on this pull request.
In CondTools/Ecal/test/BuildFile.xml:
> - <test name="EcalTPGWeightIdMap_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGWeightIdMap_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGWeightGroup_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGWeightGroup_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGSlidingWindow_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGSlidingWindow_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGPhysicsConst_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGPhysicsConst_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGLutIdMap_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGLutIdMap_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGPedestals_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGPedestals_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGLutGroup_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGLutGroup_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGLinearizationConst_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGLinearizationConst_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGFineGrainTowerEE_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGFineGrainTowerEE_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGFineGrainStripEE_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGFineGrainStripEE_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGFineGrainEBIdMap_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGFineGrainEBIdMap_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGFineGrainEBGroup_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGFineGrainEBGroup_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalADCToGeV_update_test" command="EcalADCToGeV_update_test.sh"/>
- <test name="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test" command="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test.sh"/>
@ggovi , is this removal of tests on purpose?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @ggovi |
@argiro probably a rebase would be a good option |
thanks !
… On 28 Feb 2018, at 17:59, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
@ggovi , this PR has already been merged, so no point putting a hold on it :-)
I have made a PR #22384 to get these tests back
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
@argiro |
@argiro please check again if more changes are unintended |
I am asking Francesca, who's the real author of the code ..
#22346 (comment)
… On 1 Mar 2018, at 15:42, ggovi ***@***.***> wrote:
@argiro please check again if more changes are unintended
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@argiro
this PR has reverted also CondTools/Ecal/python/updateADCToGeV_test.py
CondTools/Ecal/python/updateIntercali_test.py
|
sorry, it must have been a mistake.
Please leave the original version.
thanks
Francesca
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Stefano Argiro' <stefano.argiro@cern.ch>
wrote:
… I am asking Francesca, who's the real author of the code ..
#22346 (comment)
> On 1 Mar 2018, at 15:42, ggovi ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> @argiro please check again if more changes are unintended
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
>
>
> @argiro
> this PR has reverted also CondTools/Ecal/python/updateADCToGeV_test.py
> CondTools/Ecal/python/updateIntercali_test.py
|
Migration of Ecal PF thresholds from python-based to DB - based