Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial commit for new PF threshold DB object #22346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 27, 2018

Conversation

argiro
Copy link
Contributor

@argiro argiro commented Feb 26, 2018

Migration of Ecal PF thresholds from python-based to DB - based

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @argiro for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/EcalPlugins
CondFormats/DataRecord
CondFormats/EcalObjects
CondTools/Ecal

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @mmusich, @seemasharmafnal, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@lpernie
Copy link
Contributor

lpernie commented Feb 26, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 26, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26307/console Started: 2018/02/26 15:28

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22346/26307/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-22346/136.8311_RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2017+HARVEST2017_REMINIAOD_data2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2500248
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2500071
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.14999999988 KiB( 23 files compared)
  • Checked 118 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

@lpernie
Copy link
Contributor

lpernie commented Feb 26, 2018

+1

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Feb 27, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

<test name="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test.sh"/>
<test name="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test" command="EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test.sh"/>
<test name="EcalADCToGeV_update_test" command="EcalADCToGeV_update_test.sh"/>
<test name="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test" command="EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test.sh"/>
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar smuzaffar Feb 28, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ggovi , was this removal of tests on purpose?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@smuzaffar thanks a lot to spot this!!
@argiro please restore the tests, we are relying on these tests for the production O2Os = VERY CRITICAL

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ggovi , I had made a PR #22384 to restore these.

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

argiro commented Feb 28, 2018 via email

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Feb 28, 2018

hold

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request has been put on hold by @ggovi
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Feb 28, 2018

@argiro probably a rebase would be a good option

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@ggovi , this PR has already been merged, so no point putting a hold on it :-)
I have made a PR #22384 to get these tests back

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

argiro commented Feb 28, 2018 via email

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Mar 1, 2018

@argiro
this PR has reverted also CondTools/Ecal/python/updateADCToGeV_test.py
CondTools/Ecal/python/updateIntercali_test.py

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Mar 1, 2018

@argiro please check again if more changes are unintended

@ggovi ggovi mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2018
@argiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

argiro commented Mar 1, 2018 via email

@argiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

argiro commented Mar 2, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants