GEMGeometryParsFromDD fix

[jshlee]

Bug fix for GEMGeometryParsFromDD.
Both GEMGeometryBuilderFromCondDB and GEMGeometryParsFromDD was dividing by cm making the gem chamber size 10 times smaller in GEMRECO_Geometry_10YV3.

New gem geometry in DB is needed using this PR to fix the issue found in #22619.

@ianna @slava77 @arunhep @lpernie

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-22730/4102

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jshlee (Jason Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @dildick this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[kpedro88]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/27083/console Started: 2018/03/23 19:28

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: df41ba0
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22730/27083/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22730/27083/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2498300
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2498123
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.930000000109 KiB( 22 files compared)
• Checked 118 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

[civanch]

+1

[kpedro88]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@ianna @arunhep @lpernie do we have this update propagated to GT as well?

[civanch]

@fabiocos , I think so...

[arunhep]

@ianna @arunhep @lpernie do we have this update propagated to GT as well?

we still have in latest GT, this tag : GEMRECO_Geometry_10YV3
so if this is not the correct tag then i dont think so.

[jshlee]

@arunhep - GEMRECO_Geometry_10YV3 is the one with the problem.
The very old one GEMRECO_Geometry_92YV5 is ok.
Or preferably, using this PR would be better.

Could we have 101X_upgrade2018_realistic_v5 updated with either GEMRECO_Geometry_92YV5 or using this PR.

[fabiocos]

+1

but we need to update the GT as well