New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GCC 8.1] Fixed const correctness for operator() #23224
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23224/4692 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: CondFormats/HcalObjects @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@fabiocos please add this so that we can clear up the vast majority of compilation errors in the gcc 8 IB. Thanks. |
+1 |
To avoid GCC 8 build errors like