Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

electron reco modifications for 2018 heavy ion era #23404

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 6, 2018

Conversation

bi-ran
Copy link
Contributor

@bi-ran bi-ran commented May 31, 2018

this PR includes the following modifications to electron reconstruction for the 2018 heavy ion era:

  • raise supercluster energy thresholds
  • removal of tracker-driven electrons

these changes affect mainly very low-pt electrons, and are in line with the (old) custom heavy ion reconstruction sequence.

@mandrenguyen

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bi-ran for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
TrackingTools/GsfTracking

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@varuns23, @mmarionncern, @Sam-Harper, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @lgray, @bellan, @bachtis, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @ebrondol, @VinInn, @dgulhan, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 31, 2018 via email

@@ -81,3 +81,5 @@

)

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_pp_on_AA_2018_cff import pp_on_AA_2018
pp_on_AA_2018.toModify(ecalDrivenElectronSeedsParameters, SCEtCut = cms.double(15.0))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please drop the types in all modifications.
This is a safer use of syntax against typos and also helps with possible future parameter name changes and migrations

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 31, 2018

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 31, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28335/console Started: 2018/05/31 17:33

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23404/28335/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2902471
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2902279
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

Pull request #23404 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 1, 2018

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28380/console Started: 2018/06/01 19:25

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23404/28380/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2902471
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2902279
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 128 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 5, 2018

+1

for #23404 f48840f

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and more clearly so with the description of this PR in the RECO meeting on June 1 ("Move SC thresholds to 15 GeV, and remove tracker-driven electrons"). The changes affect only Run2_2018_pp_on_AA
  • jenkins tests pass
  • local tests with 200 events of wf 158.0 (uses Run2_2018_pp_on_AA) show expected behavior.
    • RECO time went down from 9.0 s/ev to 8.9 s/ev primarily related to the modified electron reco modules (the related reco modules were not particularly costly to start with).
    • AOD size reduces ~negligibly.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 6, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 3cc8867 into cms-sw:master Jun 6, 2018
@bi-ran bi-ran deleted the electron_reco_pp_on_AA branch April 4, 2019 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants