New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
data processing scenarios for T0 for heavy ions data taking in 2018 [bp of #24468 ] #24477
data processing scenarios for T0 for heavy ions data taking in 2018 [bp of #24468 ] #24477
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/DataProcessing @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+operations the backport looks correct |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 not affecting standard pp workflows, add new scenarios only |
backport of #24468
Two scenarions were added
ppEra_Run2_2018_pp_on_AA
which corresponds to the present default processing setup based on pp-like recoHeavyIonsEra_Run2_2018
which corresponds to a possible fall-back based on HeavyIons scenarioI also cleaned up run_CfgTest.sh from the tests of 2015/2016 scenarios. There is no practical way we will go back to these.
We will need one of the two for the HI test.