New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VBFGenJetFilter has been modfied in order to select generator level Mjj #24651
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @gmandorl for CMSSW_9_3_X. It involves the following packages: GeneratorInterface/GenFilters @alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
This is backport of a feature already integrated in master (and in older GEN-releases). It is needed to properly generate and filter VBF-Hmumu samples. |
backport of #20394 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@gmandorl at the moment is this is a not-quite-exact backport of the noted PR. Can you make it exact? |
Pull request #24651 was updated. @alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please check and sign again. |
|
It seems to me there is no difference in BuildFile.xml |
Ah, it looks like that change was already ported back to 9_3_X. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@efeyazgan this PR is changing the default behaviour fo the release, am I correct? I think we should keep the values that do not modify the behaviour, and modify the parameters in the generator setup required for specific samples |
Dear @efeyazgan, @qliphy, this PR is needed for ensuring the VBF filtering required in DYJetsToLL_M-105To160_VBFFilter requests that you can find here. Could this feature be approved in an ORP meeting and a new release be made on 93X cycle for this? Thanks. |
@fabiocos this should not change the default behaviour as leadJetsNoLepMass is default False |
@arizzi ok, I see that the change of the false default in cfi is in a new PSet not previously present. So backward compatibility is conserved |
+1 |
VBFGenJetFilter.cc has been extended.
Possible requirements on the invariant mass of the two pt-leading genJets.
The considered genJets can also be asked to have a minimum DeltaR from the event charged prompt leptons.