add gen fragment for DarkSUSY MC relval production

[mtosi]

as discussed with PdmV and SUSY HLT
we would need a new MC relval in the standard relval matrix
which produces events of the DarkSUSY process
DarkSUSY_mH_125_mN1_60_mGammaD_10_cT_10

this is the GEN fragment needed for the LHE,GEN,SIM step

the SUSY HLT team might provide some extra filters
in order to make the relval sample more pure wrt offline selection
in that case, we will either update this config or add a new fragment

@prebello @zhenbin.wu@cern.ch hope it is fine
do we need a backport to 102X ? in case, let me know, because we need a rebase of this

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24678/6607

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[davidlange6]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30671/console Started: 2018/09/26 22:43

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 7b38b58
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24678/30671/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24678/30671/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3162160
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3161962
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[prebello]

do we need a backport to 102X ? in case, let me know, because we need a rebase of this
PdmV will not produce relvals in 10-2-X , in principle. The plan was to start in 10-3-X right?

[mtosi]

@prebello
thanks for confirming

[qliphy]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@mtosi @qliphy where was this really tested?

[qliphy]

As discussed with @prebello, PdmV will implement the new relval workflow with this GEN fragment.

The fragment is indeed from the official McM request: https://cms-pdmv.cern.ch/mcm/public/restapi/requests/get_fragment/HIG-RunIIFall17wmLHEGS-02816/0
so should be fine.

@mtosi Maybe you have any local test results?

[mtosi]

/afs/cern.ch/work/t/tosi/public/STEAM/validation/SUSYrelval

[fabiocos]

+1