Auto validation 62 x slhc

[deguio]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @deguio for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Auto validation 62 x slhc

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Applications
Configuration/StandardSequences
Validation/Configuration

@civanch, @thspeer, @vlimant, @danduggan, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @nclopezo, @rovere, @deguio, @slava77, @Degano, @ojeda, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @cerati, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@andersonjacob, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

+1
this is the same as #2467
I have tested it locally and seems to work fine. the only available option at the moment is
VALIDATION:@liteTracking

this will be needed for the relVals for upgrade TP.
this pull request, together with #2409 #2437 #2405 #2359, contains what is needed to speed up the validation sequence from 27min/evt to ~5min/evt
[the extreme scenario with PU140 has been used as a benchmark for this studies]

all the listed PR should be included in the coming SLHC8
@franzoni @davidlange6

[mark-grimes]

GEM test; extended pixel test; 3300, 3400, 4100, 4400, 4502, 4500, 5001 and 15001 fine.

40001, 50002 and 60002 fail in step 1 with:

----- Begin Fatal Exception 16-Feb-2014 16:02:12 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'ProductNotFound' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1
   [1] Running path 'validation_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module MultiTrackValidator/'trackValidator'
Exception Message:
Principal::getByLabel: Found zero products matching all criteria
Looking for a container with elements of type: reco::Track
Looking for module label: cutsRecoTracksHp
Looking for productInstanceName:

   Additional Info:
      [a] If you wish to continue processing events after a ProductNotFound exception,
add "SkipEvent = cms.untracked.vstring('ProductNotFound')" to the "options" PSet in the configuration.

----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

These are all FastSim tests. Is there some additional configuration required for FastSim?

[deguio]

hello @mark-grimes
could you test again please?
thanks,
F.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #2469 was updated. @civanch, @thspeer, @vlimant, @danduggan, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @nclopezo, @rovere, @deguio, @slava77, @Degano, @ojeda, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

+1
this should fix the problems in FS
@davidlange6

[vlimant]

+1

On 2/19/14 2:48 PM, deguio wrote:

+1
this should fix the problems in FS
@davidlange6 https://github.com/davidlange6

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2469 (comment).

---

           ** Dr. Jean-Roch VLIMANT **
   CMS experiment,  CERN - Physics department

CERN Office: 40-3-A28 tel: +41 22 767 1209

CERN CMS Secretariat fax: +41 22 767 8940

[mark-grimes]

merge

Yes, thanks. GEM test; extended pixel test; 3300, 3400, 4100, 4400, 40001, 50002, 60002, 4502, 4500, 5001 and 15001 pass.