New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx157 Update the standalone digi study of HGCal (upgrade) to give reasonable o/p #24796
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24796/6739 |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/HGCalValidation @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Hi @bsunanda, could you please make sure that the there is a name of a subsystem in the title of the PR? |
@bsunanda , Also, I'm strongly in favour of adding as much DQM/Validation as needed/possible for the HGCal detector, having an accompanying Twiki page that explains what it does (and also how would be a wonderful plus). |
@rovere I fully agree with this. This is done on request by Kaushik who is doing some validation work and I shall ask him to prepare the twiki page with all validation tools and also discuss about all validation tool within DPG |
@andrius-k Sorry I missed out the name which I have now added |
@andrius-k Could you sign this please? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Also split it up for each sub detector