Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx157 Update the standalone digi study of HGCal (upgrade) to give reasonable o/p #24796

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 11, 2018

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Oct 3, 2018

Also split it up for each sub detector

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/HGCalValidation

@kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vandreev11, @sethzenz, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @pfs, @kpedro88 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 3, 2018

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30876/console Started: 2018/10/03 18:29

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24796/30876/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3162909
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162710
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@andrius-k
Copy link

Hi @bsunanda, could you please make sure that the there is a name of a subsystem in the title of the PR?

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 4, 2018

@bsunanda ,
while I have nothing in abstract terms against test code that could be run standalone, I do feel the need to discuss this kind of tools in a more general way with a bigger audience, so that relevant people are aware of their existence.

Also, I'm strongly in favour of adding as much DQM/Validation as needed/possible for the HGCal detector, having an accompanying Twiki page that explains what it does (and also how would be a wonderful plus).

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 8, 2018

@rovere I fully agree with this. This is done on request by Kaushik who is doing some validation work and I shall ask him to prepare the twiki page with all validation tools and also discuss about all validation tool within DPG

@bsunanda bsunanda changed the title Phase2-hgx157 Update the standalone digi study to give reasonable o/p Phase2-hgx157 Update the standalone digi study of HGCal (upgrade) to give reasonable o/p Oct 8, 2018
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 8, 2018

@andrius-k Sorry I missed out the name which I have now added

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Oct 9, 2018

@andrius-k Could you sign this please?

@andrius-k
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar modified the milestones: CMSSW_10_3_X, CMSSW_10_4_X Oct 10, 2018
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ad54b36 into cms-sw:master Oct 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants