Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PFEGammaProducer with fillDescriptions #24863

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Oct 23, 2018
Merged

PFEGammaProducer with fillDescriptions #24863

merged 5 commits into from Oct 23, 2018

Conversation

guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

@guitargeek guitargeek commented Oct 14, 2018

Continuing cleaning up the PFEGammaProducer/Algo.

This time, I moved the configuration to the fillDescriptions function and removed unused parameters on that occasion.

Local matrix tests pass.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @bachtis, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 14, 2018

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 14, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31024/console Started: 2018/10/14 22:31

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24863/31024/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2994723
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2994524
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta perrotta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also consider adding comments to (some of) the parameters inserted with your fillDescription method (see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/SWGuideConfigurationValidationAndHelp#Adding_Comments) so that the auto-produced cfi will become more easily readable

@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ class PFEGammaAlgo {
std::string mvaweightfile ;
double mvaConvCut;
bool useReg;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This useReg can also get removed from the class members

psd0.add<bool> ("bCorrect", true);
psd0.add<double>("dptRel_MergedTrack", 5.0);
psd0.add<double>("dptRel_PrimaryTrack", 10.0);
desc.add<edm::ParameterSetDescription>("iCfgCandConnector", psd0);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this pset really needed, or could it be also cleaned?

desc.add<bool> ("pf_electronID_crackCorrection", false);
desc.add<double> ("pf_conv_mvaCut", 0.0);
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoForPhoton", 2.0);
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoSlopeForPhoton", 0.001);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this needed?

desc.add<double> ("pf_electron_mvaCut", -0.1);
desc.add<bool> ("pf_electronID_crackCorrection", false);
desc.add<double> ("pf_conv_mvaCut", 0.0);
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoForPhoton", 2.0);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is for the PFPhotonAlgo: since you are cleaning, is it really needed here?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #24863 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 18, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31136/console Started: 2018/10/18 15:45

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24863/31136/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2994843
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2994645
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • PFEGammaProducer cleaned from unused class members and configuration parameters; fillDescription() method is added to deal with those parameters
  • Said so, the pull request is kind of technical: no effects are visible in the standard outputs, and none were expected

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1919f96 into cms-sw:master Oct 23, 2018
@guitargeek guitargeek deleted the PFEGammaProducer_fillDescriptions branch December 9, 2018 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants