New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PFEGammaProducer with fillDescriptions #24863
PFEGammaProducer with fillDescriptions #24863
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24863/6833 |
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please also consider adding comments to (some of) the parameters inserted with your fillDescription method (see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/SWGuideConfigurationValidationAndHelp#Adding_Comments) so that the auto-produced cfi will become more easily readable
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ class PFEGammaAlgo { | |||
std::string mvaweightfile ; | |||
double mvaConvCut; | |||
bool useReg; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This useReg can also get removed from the class members
psd0.add<bool> ("bCorrect", true); | ||
psd0.add<double>("dptRel_MergedTrack", 5.0); | ||
psd0.add<double>("dptRel_PrimaryTrack", 10.0); | ||
desc.add<edm::ParameterSetDescription>("iCfgCandConnector", psd0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this pset really needed, or could it be also cleaned?
desc.add<bool> ("pf_electronID_crackCorrection", false); | ||
desc.add<double> ("pf_conv_mvaCut", 0.0); | ||
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoForPhoton", 2.0); | ||
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoSlopeForPhoton", 0.001); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this needed?
desc.add<double> ("pf_electron_mvaCut", -0.1); | ||
desc.add<bool> ("pf_electronID_crackCorrection", false); | ||
desc.add<double> ("pf_conv_mvaCut", 0.0); | ||
desc.add<double> ("sumPtTrackIsoForPhoton", 2.0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is for the PFPhotonAlgo: since you are cleaning, is it really needed here?
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24863/6899 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Continuing cleaning up the PFEGammaProducer/Algo.
This time, I moved the configuration to the fillDescriptions function and removed unused parameters on that occasion.
Local matrix tests pass.