Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented option to run jobs in parallel for PV validation #24906

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 24, 2018

Conversation

cardinia
Copy link
Contributor

@connorpa
Option for running jobs in parallel for the Primary Vertex Validation implemented and tested as discussed in Tracker Alignment meeting (https://indico.cern.ch/event/750047/#35-parallelisation-of-validati)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cardinia for master.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation

@cmsbuild, @franzoni, @pohsun, @tocheng, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented Oct 17, 2018

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 17, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31103/console Started: 2018/10/17 16:05

if self.NJobs > 1:
raise AllInOneError("Parallel jobs not implemented for the PrimaryVertex validation!\n"
"Please set parallelJobs = 1.")
# if self.NJobs > 1:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cardinia why keep the commented out lines?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mmusich , they can be removed without problems. I initially thought that keeping them could be useful when working on the Parallel Validation code itself to loosen some of the current limitations (number of jobs to be sent in parallel or the need to specify the maximum number of events). But that was just a thought, their usefulness is basically none, I can remove those lines without problems.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #24906 was updated. @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @pohsun, @tocheng, @lpernie can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24906/31103/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2994843
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2994644
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar not sure why the status of test and comparison was not updated

@lpernie @tocheng could you please review this PR?

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented Oct 23, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 23, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31217/console Started: 2018/10/23 10:10

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@fabiocos , PR was updated that is why test and comparison signatures were sent to pending.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24906/31217/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2994843
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2994645
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ef39b89 into cms-sw:master Oct 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants