Raw data mapper sequence backport

[icali]

hi, it is a backport of #24910. No changes in the code.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @icali (Ivan Amos Cali) for CMSSW_10_3_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Applications
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
EventFilter/RawDataCollector

@cmsbuild, @prebello, @zhenhu, @emeschi, @kpedro88, @pgunnell, @franzoni, @mommsen, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Raw data remapper sequence #24910

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test workflow 140.55

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31131/console Started: 2018/10/18 12:30

[slava77]

backport of #24910

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 70c564b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24921/31131/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[prebello]

+1

tests approved

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24921/31131/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3163099
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162900
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[boudoul]

dear @prebello , as usual the review process is implying to look first at the master PR , and then check that the backport is consistent with the master , could you please sign there ?

[fabiocos]

+operations

[fabiocos]

@mommsen @kpedro88 at this point I think we should move forward with this backport and build 10_3_0

[fabiocos]

+1

the backport corresponds to the original version of the code approved nd merged in master

[fabiocos]

merge