Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added missing cmath header to GBRForest #25085

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2018

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

Needed cmath for exp function.

NOTE: this fixes the compiler errors seen in the DEVEL build.

Needed cmath for exp function.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/EgammaObjects

@tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @pohsun, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31419/console Started: 2018/11/01 15:24

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabiocos @smuzaffar this fixes the compilation problems seen in the DEVEL IB.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25085/31419/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2993155
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 24
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2992934
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 2, 2018

@Dr15Jones I would expect that the differences (mostly in L1T but not the usual ones) have nothing to do with this PR. @lpernie @tocheng @ggovi could you please sign?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 2, 2018

The problem was introduced by the recent merge of #24432 in https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/24432/files#diff-6c5b8b2e5e434ddb757c1b57ab5aca0b
@smuzaffar I noticed an error reported in the header check #24432 (comment) , but as usual it was obscure, and not affecting this file...

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

smuzaffar commented Nov 2, 2018

@fabiocos , problem is due to boost version. We were getting this (cmath) header indirectly from boost. In DEVEL IBs we have boost 1.67.0 they have remove some unneeded includes that is why we only see this failure in DEVEL IBs. header consistency check should not have caught this as cmath was indirectly visible via boost headers.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 2, 2018

@smuzaffar thanks for the clarification

@pohsun
Copy link

pohsun commented Nov 5, 2018

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 5, 2018

@ggovi could you please check and sign it?

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@ggovi , can you please sign this. This is breaking DEVEL IBs.

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Nov 6, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 6, 2018

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants