Geo2018 with Detailed Cavern and MB4Shiedls for CMSSw_10_3

[slomeo]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for CMSSW_10_3_X.

It involves the following packages:

CondTools/Geometry
Configuration/Geometry

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @mdhildreth, @ggovi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @mmusich, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Geometry 2018 (updated Cavern and new shields) #25744

[ianna]

backport of #25744

[kpedro88]

Why is this needed in 10_3_X?

[ianna]

due to the boost version problems at the DropBox side

[cvuosalo]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32936/console Started: 2019/01/31 18:40

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 842b828
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25821/32936/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25821/32936/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3203312
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3203114
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[kpedro88]

+upgrade

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@ggovi this looks a workaround, in principle one should be able to use 10_5_X for this, am I correct?

[fabiocos]

+1