New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move duplicate getCtfTrackRef function to its own file #25976
Move duplicate getCtfTrackRef function to its own file #25976
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25976/8481
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos @cmsbuild, @perrotta, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About the name of the file: you could do something similar as, e.g., EgAmbiguityTools in the same package: GsfElectronTools (?) with a namespace which includes the functions in it (only this one, by now).
About the name of the function, since it is only addressed in a couple of places in cmssw, I think you can rename it in some more appropriate way if you think so.
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | |||
#ifndef getCtfTrackRef_h |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Include guard should include the full path
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok! Thanks for giving your opinion.
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Just some reorganization of duplicate code in RecoEgamma, which also goes in the direction of slimming down a bit GsfElectronAlgo aka. "the electron god class".
Are there any convention related to names of files holding free functions like this? And do you maybe share my sentiment that the function should be maybe given a more clear name like
getClosestCtfToGsf
?