New working point for B parking skim

[gkaratha]

Dear all,

Please consider this new PR. Its a better WP for B parking skimming. No code has been changed. Only the WP. The new WP has 6.5% rate while keeping a bit more than 29% in efficiency. Thanks.

Best regards,
George Karathanasis

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[gkaratha]

@bainbrid @mverzett

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26015/8536

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @gkaratha for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Skimming

@cmsbuild, @zhenhu, @prebello, @pgunnell can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[prebello]

hi @kfjack could you please take a look ?
thank you

[kfjack]

Hi @prebello I think this change is totally okay (only changed one single threshold)! Many thanks.

[fabiocos]

@gkaratha sorry to be pedantic, but please update the title to something a bit more explicative (New working point for B parking skim ?)

[fabiocos]

please test workflow 136.898

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/33283/console Started: 2019/02/26 10:22

[gkaratha]

Dear @fabiocos ,

You are right it was an awful name. Thanks for the suggestion.

Best,
George

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c065dc3
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26015/33283/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[prebello]

+1

Thank you @kfjack

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26015/33283/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26015/136.898_RunParkingBPH2018B+RunParkingBPH2018B+HLTDR2_2018+RECODR2_2018reHLT_skimParkingBPH_Prompt+HARVEST2018

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3098286
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3098088
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[fabiocos]

@gkaratha if you have any plot showing the improvement please attach it to this PR

[fabiocos]

+1

[gkaratha]

Dear @fabiocos ,

Yes, gladly. I have attached it. Thanks.

Best regards,
George