New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial PPS Simulation Geometry PR #26555
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26555/9455
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mundim for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
double& lower_y, | ||
double& higher_y) const { | ||
// x and y in the system of Geant4 SIMULATION | ||
arow = 159 - arow; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This class seems to be full of magic numbers. These are not new in this PR, but at some point they should be replaced with named constants (or even better, obtained from geometry XML specifications in case any of them changes in the future).
+upgrade |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26555/9650
|
Pull request #26555 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+upgrade |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 this looks now ready to enter |
PR description:
PR with the Geometry related files only (new and modified ones) for the PPS simulation
PR validation:
It has passed through a reviewing process for which
scram b code-checks
was already ran
This one has been rebased and now, also:
scram b code-format
was ran, together with
scram b runtests
runTheMatrix.py which gave the output:
21 17 16 15 8 1 0 0 0 tests passed, 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 failed
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: