Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dressed lepton constituents, add tau ghosts #26616

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 4, 2019

Conversation

mseidel42
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

  • Rivet 2.7.0 requires changes to access dressed lepton constituents (= bare lepton + photons). This did not impact any calculations done with the dressed lepton as a whole.
  • Added ghost tau ancestors to identify electrons/muons from tau decays.

PR validation:

Tested on ttbar sample, number of dressed lepton constituents has entries >1 as expected again. Tau ghosts increase number of constituents and show up in the tags collection.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26616/9571

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @intrepid42 (Markus Seidel) for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface

@alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @perrozzi, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented May 3, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34488/console Started: 2019/05/03 22:44

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26616/34488/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211964
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211759
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented May 4, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented May 4, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b990340 into cms-sw:master May 4, 2019
@peruzzim
Copy link
Contributor

peruzzim commented May 6, 2019

@intrepid42: discussing with @emanca, I understand this feature is meant to support analysis. Should it be backported to 10_2_X? Is it going to affect the products in ongoing production campaigns?

@mseidel42
Copy link
Contributor Author

@peruzzim Yes, it would be great to have this in centrally produced nanoAod. It adds one tag particle for the dressed lepton GenJets. Please let us know when it would be fine to insert this change. The code needed for 10_2_X will be a bit different because of the older Rivet version there.

@peruzzim
Copy link
Contributor

peruzzim commented May 6, 2019

The question is, whether merging this code (or an equivalent version of it, because of different Rivet version) will change the output of MINIAOD production in 10_2_X. If so, it would be a problem because there are ongoing production campaigns in 10_2_X. I think we have nothing calling this code in MINIAOD production, but could you please verify this point?

@mseidel42
Copy link
Contributor Author

mseidel42 commented May 6, 2019

This is not run in MINIAOD production. Only at analysis level and nanoAod.

@peruzzim
Copy link
Contributor

peruzzim commented May 6, 2019

good, then I would say you can backport it immediately - thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants