New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HeaderCheck][ANALYSIS] Cleanup headers to avoid header inconsistency errors #26666
Conversation
smuzaffar
commented
May 6, 2019
- Removed unused header files
- Drop ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZMuMu/src and ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZMuMu/interface
- All ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZMuMu/src/*.cc code is commented and no one uses any header from ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZMuMu/interface
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26666/9627
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZMuMu @cmsbuild, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Tested at: dd19207 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: AddOn
I found errors in the following addon tests: cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/slc7_amd64_gcc700/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_10_6_X_2019-05-06-1100/src/PhysicsTools/PatAlgos/test/IntegrationTest_cfg.py : FAILED - time: date Mon May 6 18:50:28 2019-date Mon May 6 18:48:59 2019 s - exit: 23552 |
Comparison job queued. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@santocch could you please check this PR? Not sure whether this code is used outside CMSSW? |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |