Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running code-format for simulation #26755

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 16, 2019
Merged

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Applying code-format for CMSSW category simulation.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/212//console

cms-bot has successfully run the following:

  • scram build code-checks-all
  • scram build code-format-all
  • scram build

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26755/9749

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented May 11, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/165/console Started: 2019/05/11 12:18

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/DTDigi
IOMC/EventVertexGenerators
SimCalorimetry/EcalSelectiveReadoutAlgos
SimDataFormats/TrackingAnalysis
SimG4CMS/Forward
SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam
SimG4CMS/ShowerLibraryProducer
SimGeneral/PreMixingModule
SimMuon/RPCDigitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@battibass, @makortel, @abbiendi, @jhgoh, @argiro, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @rovere, @ebrondol, @trocino, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d44965/165/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-d44965/11624.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211964
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 131
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211629
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 12, 2019

+1
@smuzaffar , @fabiocos, there is a compilation problem in

CommonTools/RecoAlgos/interface/PhotonSelector.h

which has no relation to this PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @civanch to double check. Yes CommonTools/RecoAlgos/interface/PhotonSelector.h is not needed and suppose to be removed once #26697 is merged

@smuzaffar smuzaffar modified the milestones: CMSSW_10_6_X, CMSSW_11_0_X May 14, 2019
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2c91040 into master May 16, 2019
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the code-format-simulation-6ced81 branch May 31, 2019 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants