New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modernized ES modules in TrackingTools/TrackFitters #27003
Conversation
In addition to consumes, switched to using ESGetToken
In addition, switched to using ESGetToken.
In addition, switched to using ESGetToken.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27003/10062
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: TrackingTools/TrackFitters @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
part of #26748 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
mixing massive code formats with actual code changes makes it impossible to review |
@VinInn the format was done on a separate commit. It is possible to add comments to individual commits which would allow you to see just the code changes. |
the commits are separated |
On 5/30/19 5:37 AM, Vincenzo Innocente wrote:
mixing massive code formats with actual code changes makes it impossible
to review
the commits are separated
so
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/27003/files/c4ef96fe433d92406c4d5668b5d12833c130d4be..8475148a422fe4b9d3340c9ea82fc89df6b47f20
is the easy to read part and allows for comments
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
theErrorRescaling(errorRescaling), | ||
minHits_(minHits), | ||
theGeometry( | ||
nullptr) { // to be fixed. Why this first constructor is needed? who is using it? Can it be removed? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this might be fixed...
if (it->recHitR().isValid()) | ||
break; | ||
tmpTraj.push(std::move(*it), | ||
smoothed.chiSquared()); //push the first valid measurement and set the same global chi2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this as well...
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Code compiles