Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant unique_ptr constructor calls from Reco #27194

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Jun 27, 2019

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR is a follow-up to #27097 to remove now-redundant calls to unique_ptr constructor.

PR validation:

Code compiles

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27194/10359

  • This PR adds an extra 188KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers
RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonAlgos
RecoHGCal/TICL
RecoHI/HiEgammaAlgos
RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers
RecoLocalCalo/HGCalRecProducers
RecoLocalFastTime/FTLRecProducers
RecoLocalMuon/GEMSegment
RecoMuon/MuonIdentification
RecoMuon/MuonIsolation
RecoMuon/MuonIsolationProducers
RecoMuon/TrackerSeedGenerator
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets
RecoTauTag/RecoTau
RecoTracker/CkfPattern
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/TkSeedGenerator
TrackingTools/TrajectoryFiltering

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @abbiendi, @kpedro88, @argiro, @jshlee, @pfs, @varuns23, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @sethzenz, @battibass, @jhgoh, @lgray, @HuguesBrun, @drkovalskyi, @trocino, @rociovilar, @vandreev11, @Sam-Harper, @kurtejung, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @cseez, @bellan, @hatakeyamak, @mschrode, @ebrondol, @dgulhan, @echapon, @mandrenguyen, @jazzitup, @edjtscott, @calderona, @yenjie, @bachtis, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @yetkinyilmaz, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 12, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/925/console Started: 2019/06/12 21:38

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-815dbe/925/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3254096
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3253761
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Technical
  • Jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-815dbe/1133/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3254598
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3254263
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 25, 2019

hold

until the situation with #27160 is clear (hopefully that one can go in first)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request has been put on hold by @slava77
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 27, 2019

unhold

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label Jun 27, 2019
// it means that there is a PFCandidate with the same GsfTrack
myMvaOutput.status = 3; //as defined in PFCandidateEGammaExtra.h
newElectron.setPassPflowPreselection(
true); //this is currently fully redundant with mvaOutput.stats so candidate for removal
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line break issue (it can be solved in a follow-up patch, as usual)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fabiocos I can take care of these after this PR has been merged.

} else {
myMvaOutput.status = 4; //
newElectron.setPassPflowPreselection(
false); //this is currently fully redundant with mvaOutput.stats so candidate for removal
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line break issue (it can be solved in a follow-up patch, as usual)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants