Run3-hcx223 Convert DDHCalTestBeamAlgo to dd4hep scenario

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Convert one more algorithm DDHCalTestBeamAlgo from DDD to DD4Hep scenario

PR validation:

Tested with a cfg file in Geometry/HcalAlgo/test/python

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27868/11621

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27868/11621/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27868/11621/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27868/11622

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/HcalAlgo

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2177/console Started: 2019/08/26 03:30

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 2f9da43
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b693a0/2177/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b693a0/2177/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2939508
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2939162
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 145 log files, 15 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27868/11635

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2191/console Started: 2019/08/26 19:44

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #27868 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: a402e60
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b693a0/2191/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b693a0/2191/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2939508
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2939166
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 145 log files, 15 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[cvuosalo]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[kpedro88]

+1