New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DT DQM: Fixing inconsistency in L1Tstage2 #28105
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
please test workflow 134.701,134.702,134.703,134.704,134.705,134.706,134.707,134.708,134.709,134.71,134.801,134.802,134.803,134.804,134.805,134.806,134.807,134.808,134.809,134.81 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28105/12108
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/DTMonitorModule @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 @jfernan2 @Martin-Grunewald thank you for the quick follow up |
PR description:
This PR fixes problem reported in
#27996 (comment)
PR validation:
Tested with runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos
and with the conflictive wfs:
runTheMatrix.py -l 134.701,134.702,134.703,134.704,134.705,134.706,134.707,134.708,134.709,134.71,134.801,134.802,134.803,134.804,134.805,134.806,134.807,134.808,134.809,134.81 -i all --ibeos
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
No backport expected