Remove obsolete Validation/RecoEgamma test configuration

[fabiocos]

PR description:

Following the discussion #28184 (review) .

PR validation:

The code was unchanged since the CVS migration (at least) and seems definitely unused, no reason to maintain it if not needed

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28194/12297

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Validation/RecoEgamma/test/ElectronFromUncleanedOnly_cfg.py modified in PR(s): Add a script to split a CMSSW configuration into individual cfi files #27305

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/RecoEgamma

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[fabiocos]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/3005/console Started: 2019/10/17 11:18

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: e955fad

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• Explicitly use std::isinf in DeepCMVATagInfoProducer #28187 @Dr15Jones: Explicitly use std::isinf in DeepCMVATagInfoProducer
• Fix usage of PrintOptions #28184 @fwyzard: Fix usage of PrintOptions
• use python from env instead of /usr/bin/python #28188 @smuzaffar: use python from env instead of /usr/bin/python
• updated architecture to mach cc* too #28189 @smuzaffar: updated architecture to mach cc* too

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

• Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalLaser_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test SiStripDCS_O2O_test had ERRORS

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• Explicitly use std::isinf in DeepCMVATagInfoProducer #28187 @Dr15Jones: Explicitly use std::isinf in DeepCMVATagInfoProducer
• Fix usage of PrintOptions #28184 @fwyzard: Fix usage of PrintOptions
• use python from env instead of /usr/bin/python #28188 @smuzaffar: use python from env instead of /usr/bin/python
• updated architecture to mach cc* too #28189 @smuzaffar: updated architecture to mach cc* too

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c0489/3005/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961064
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960722
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

+1

[fabiocos]

merge