Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move contents of beginJob() to endJob() in APVValidationPlots #28942

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 13, 2020

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Following the discussion in #28920, this PR removes the TH1* pointer member variables by moving the contents of beginJob() to endJob(). Now it is crystal clear that this module accesses DQMStore only in endJob(), and does not need anything elsewhere in CMSSW.

PR validation:

Code compiles. I tried to run the two configuration files in DQMOffline/CalibTracker/test that use APVValidationPlots module, but they are nonfunctional for other reasons.

This move avoids storing TH1* pointers from MonitorElements as member
variables (even though that should not cause any problems because no
work is done during the event loop). Anyway, now it is crystal clear
that this module accesses DQMStore only in endJob(), and does not need
anything from elsewhere in CMSSW.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28942/13750

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/CalibTracker

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I also wonder if this code is really used anywhere.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 12, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4633/console Started: 2020/02/12 23:40

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: d204878
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8bda87/4633/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-12-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8bda87/4633/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694005
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2693658
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 697a1dd into cms-sw:master Feb 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants