Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply puppi weight in BoostedDoubleSV btaginfo for packedPFCandidates #29300

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Apr 13, 2020

Conversation

ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Resolve issue #29132.
This makes the treatment of puppi weights consistent between BoostedDoubleSV btaginfo computed from particleFlow and packedPFcandidates.
It introduces small changes in the b-tag discriminators computed from PackedCandidates, namely pfDeepDoublevJetTags and pfMassIndependentDeepDoublevJetTags.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix -l 136.8311
Verified that the corresponding discriminator value change.
@emilbols @hqucms @XavierAtCERN

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

no backport planned.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29300/14365

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ahinzmann for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoBTag/SecondaryVertex

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jdamgov, @emilbols, @gouskos, @jdolen, @smoortga, @riga, @schoef, @rappoccio, @mariadalfonso, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @nhanvtran, @gpetruc, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @hatakeyamak, @ferencek, @mverzett, @andrzejnovak, @peruzzim, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test workflow 25202.01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 25, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 2d2f563

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-03-25-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-475d3e/5376/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
25202.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25.log

25202.01 step5
runTheMatrix-results/25202.01_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15MC_PU25_JME/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15MC_PU25_JME.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test with #29296 workflow 25202.01

@cmsbuild cmsbuild mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2020
@ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's test this one again?

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 25202.01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 28, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29300/14571

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

Pull request #29300 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 8, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5590/console Started: 2020/04/08 14:34

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

+1
Tested at: 40ecd33
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-475d3e/5590/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-07-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-475d3e/5590/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 154 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2692110
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 61
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2691730
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 8, 2020

+1

for #29300 40ecd33

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show differences only in available slimmedJetsAK8 pairDiscriVector variables with somewhat insignificant changes in the distributions

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

do you have any comments @santocch ?

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit bbcddfd into cms-sw:master Apr 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants