New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use LogTrace in IsolatedPixelTrackCandidateL1TProducer #29459
Use LogTrace in IsolatedPixelTrackCandidateL1TProducer #29459
Conversation
Changed edm::LogVerbatim to LogTrace to speed up code.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29459/14653
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: Calibration/HcalIsolatedTrackReco @cmsbuild, @pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Changed edm::LogVerbatim to LogTrace to speed up code. IgProf traces of HLT jobs showed the edm::LogVerbatim calls from this module were taking about 0.7% of the entire event processing time.
PR validation:
The code compiles.