Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add packages used by headers in CondFormats #30039

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 3, 2020

Conversation

davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 davidlange6 commented May 29, 2020

As noted in the modules IB, some package dependencies are missing from the BuildFile. This PR adds them. Changes are to CondFormats/BeamSpotObjects and CondFormats/RecoMuonObjects.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@davidlange6 davidlange6 changed the title add packages used by headers in CondFormats/RecoMuonObjects add packages used by headers in CondFormats May 29, 2020
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30039/15743

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 29, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6681/console Started: 2020/05/29 10:08

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/BeamSpotObjects
CondFormats/RecoMuonObjects

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng, @seemasharmafnal, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 3c03f55

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-05-28-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test EcalDCS_O2O_test had ERRORS

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not related to the changes in this PR .

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cecbc6/6681/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2780792
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2780693
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@vgvassilev
Copy link
Contributor

Ping

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smuzaffar - is this unit test expected to work in pr tests?

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

No, there is no fix forthis unit test yet ( #30049 )

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlange6 commented Jun 2, 2020 via email

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

@silviodonato - perhaps this can be merged? There is no feedback from those responsible...

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants