Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use HGCalRecHitMapProducer #30061

Merged
merged 20 commits into from Jun 16, 2020

Conversation

lecriste
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Replace all occurrences of fillHitMap with HGCalRecHitMapProducer and std::map with std::unordered_map in HGCalRecHitMapProducer. No changes are expected in the output.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix -l limited

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30061/15777

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30061/15779

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 9, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bd5be0/6906/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2780497
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2780409
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+dqm

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Replacements and modifications in the code applied as anticipated in the PR description
  • With the latest commits finally also decoupled the relevant reconstruction sequence from Validation or Simulation ones
  • Timing is roughly untouched wrt previous version of the code in the noPU wf 21234.0
  • Jenkins tests pass and show no differences wrt baseline

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 12, 2020

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@alja can you please evaluate and sign for visualization (if you think so)?

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented Jun 15, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet