Fix for the recently updated HI event content

[perrotta]

PR description:

In the restructuring campaign for the reconstruction related event contents, PR #29990 updated the HI ones. In doing so, however, we overlooked the fact that all new event contents started with a "drop *" statement: when more than one of them is put in a row, the "drop *" statement of the second one reset the previous content.

This was noticed in the IB since CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-02-2300, and reported in issue #30095.

This PR reports back those event contents which were broken in the previous implementation, and solves that issue.

@jeongeun

PR validation:

Workflows 140.0 and 150.0 now run without errors

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[perrotta]

please test workflow 140,150

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30097/15842

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

• MATRIX_EXTRAS = 150,140
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6776/console Started: 2020/06/03 17:59

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/EventContent
RecoHI/Configuration

@perrotta, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @slava77, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echapon, @MiheeJo, @jazzitup, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @mandrenguyen, @dgulhan, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[perrotta]

please abort

[cmsbuild]

Jenkins tests are aborted.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[perrotta]

please test workflow 140,150
(I realized that the reco config is not the best place where to store the RAW event content... Put it back in EventContentHeavyIons_cff.py, as it was done in origine)

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30097/15843

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

• MATRIX_EXTRAS = 150,140
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6778/console Started: 2020/06/03 18:38

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #30097 was updated. @perrotta, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @slava77, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 597c430
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d16c24/6778/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-02-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d16c24/6778/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-d16c24/140.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2011+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2011+DIGIHI2011+RECOHI2011+HARVESTHI2011

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2783666
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2783568
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
• Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

[perrotta]

+1

• It fixes the EventContent for HI workflows, that was broken after merging Cleaning Cosmic and HI event content structures #29990
• HI workflows failing in IB now succeed.
• Jenkins tests pass without changes in all other workflows

[silviodonato]

+operations

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1