New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import ClusterShapeHitFilterESProducer_cfi explicitly in SiPixelPhase1OfflineDQM_source_cff #30141
Import ClusterShapeHitFilterESProducer_cfi explicitly in SiPixelPhase1OfflineDQM_source_cff #30141
Conversation
Assumption it would be loaded by something else does not always hold (e.g. in Cosmic workflow without ALCA).
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30141/15926
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/SiPixelPhase1Config @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test workflow 138.1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
merge |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
The workflow 138.1 fails in IBs because the
ClusterShapeHitFilterESProducer_cfi
is not imported/loaded byALCA
step anymore. This PR proposes to import theClusterShapeHitFilterESProducer
explicitly inSiPixelPhase1OfflineDQM_source_cff
to guarantee that the ESProducer is available.Resolves #30140.
PR validation:
Workflow 138.1 runs.