Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of UL scales and smearings to 106X #30199

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 19, 2020

Conversation

jainshilpi
Copy link
Contributor

This is essentially a backport of #29526
to 106X.

Just to mention the changes again:

(1) EnergyScaleCorrection.cc/h
(2) calibratedEgammas_cff.py

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 11, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @jainshilpi for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaTools

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sobhatta, @afiqaize, @Sam-Harper, @varuns23, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 11, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/6971/console Started: 2020/06/11 18:38

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #29526

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 575f240
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea43ff/6971/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-06-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea43ff/6971/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3212324
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 19
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211971
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 19, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

to refresh the tests

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 19, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 575f240
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea43ff/7208/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-06-19-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ea43ff/7208/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3212264
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211927
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 19, 2020

+1

for #30199 575f240

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants