Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

embed hi photon isolation in pat::photon userdata #30255

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

bi-ran
Copy link
Contributor

@bi-ran bi-ran commented Jun 15, 2020

this PR takes the HI-style photon isolation information, which are stored in RECO as valuemaps, and adds it to the userdata of the PAT photons. the change is applied to the pp_on_AA_2018 and pp_on_PbPb_run3 eras.

the existing code is modified slightly to allow the reco::Photon collection to also be used as input, because the isolation valuemaps are keyed by that collection. the changes should not affect usage in pp, since edm::View allows both reco:: and pat:: collections to be read.

tested with the 158/159 workflows that the information can be stored and read out.

@mandrenguyen

for the pp_on_AA_2018 era.

change pat:: types to reco:: types to allow using reco:: collections as
input.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30255/16157

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bi-ran for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaTools

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @jainshilpi, @lgray, @sobhatta, @afiqaize, @varuns23 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 16, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 576b8bd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e579c5/7100/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-15-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e579c5/7100/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2778811
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2778754
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test
(to refresh the tests)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #30354
Test Parameters:

  • MATRIX_EXTRAS = 140.5611

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 1, 2020

+1

  • The new isolation selection for PAT photons in Run3 HI has been compared with the current one thanks to the new HI re-miniAOD workflows defined with reMiniAOD relval workflows for heavy ions #30354: the size of slimmed photons is significantly reduced with this selection with respect to the one that would have been obtained with the standard (pp) selection
  • Changes in the reco code are instrumental to apply them to reco objects, instead of only candidates, but they have no effect on the other standard workflows
  • Jenkins tests pass and show no differences anywhere else than in the HI re-miniAOD

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jul 2, 2020

@cmsbuild please test workflow 140.5611
(this will hopefully unblock bot)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 2, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 2, 2020

+1
Tested at: 576b8bd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e579c5/7605/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-01-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 2, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d3345ee into cms-sw:master Jul 2, 2020
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 2, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e579c5/7605/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2784120
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2784064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 154 log files, 17 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants