New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update of the DT migration to DD4HEP #31043
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31043/17542
|
A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/DTGeometryBuilder @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31043/17545
|
Pull request #31043 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again. |
@@ -32,7 +42,8 @@ int DTNumberingScheme::baseNumberToUnitNumber(const MuonBaseNumber& num) const { | |||
edm::LogVerbatim("DTNumberingScheme") << level << " " << num.getSuperNo(level) << " " << num.getBaseNo(level); | |||
} | |||
#endif | |||
if (num.getLevels() != theWireLevel) { | |||
// if (num.getLevels() != theWireLevel) { | |||
if (num.getLevels() < theStationLevel) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you sure you want to keep this version of the if
statement? What is the correct number of levels? Have you talked to Sunanda about this? He recently fixed a similar problem with the GEMs.
Whatever you decide, make sure the message on line 48 matches the if
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cvuosalo I fixed line 48
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@slomeo I just give a warning sign and proceed. I test the number of levels at each step before assigning chamber, roll, ...
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31043/17554
|
Pull request #31043 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again. |
edm::LogWarning("DTNumberingScheme") << "DTNumberingScheme::BNToUN: BaseNumber has " << num.getLevels() | ||
<< " levels, need " << theWireLevel; | ||
<< " levels, need " << theWireLevel; //it was theWireLevel; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<< " levels, need " << theWireLevel; //it was theWireLevel; | |
<< " levels, need " << theStationLevel; //it was theWireLevel; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cvuosalo : done
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31043/18029
|
Pull request #31043 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Update the DT migration to DD4hep after @bsunanda PRs #29842 #29943 and @ianna PR #29954.
PR validation:
validation made by Geometry/DTGeometryBuilder/test/python/validateDTGeometry_cfg.py
validation by runTheMatrix.py -l 25202.1 :
25202.1_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15APVSimu_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25 Step0-PASSED Step1-PASSED Step2-PASSED Step3-PASSED - time date Tue Aug 4 11:08:53 2020-date Tue Aug 4 10:46:39 2020; exit: 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 failed
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
nothing special