New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DD4hep] Migrate to a new version of DD4hep #31173
[DD4hep] Migrate to a new version of DD4hep #31173
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31173/17806
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31173/17816
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ianna (Ianna Osborne) for master. It involves the following packages: DetectorDescription/DDCMS @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
@mrodozov - now it should be fully functional when the dd4hep external library is fixed. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31173/17833
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
@kpedro88 - please, review. Thanks! |
@kpedro88 - please, review this PR. Thanks! |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Filter
andSpecParRegistry
, remove local copies.@cvuosalo - this is a second step in cleaning up
DetectorDescription/DDCMS
@mrodozov - this PR will help you to reproduce the missing symbols problem.
It's done forDetectorDescription/DDCMS
package only.PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: