New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGC trigger] Update module mapping #31524
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31524/18491
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for master. It involves the following packages: L1Trigger/L1THGCal @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @benkrikler, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+upgrade |
@jbsauvan Thanks. Should we have a backport to CMSSW_11_1_X? As I understand, this PR is not meant to introduce any changes on the active HGC cells, and therefore is not supposed to have any effect on Level1 Phase2 Trigger ParticleFlow and Egamma in the EndCap. Strictly speaking, we should have a backport of this PR into 11_1, in which case it would be included it in the finally validated release for reprocessing of HLT TDR samples. (Attn @kpedro88 @silviodonato @Sam-Harper @fwyzard ) |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
@jbsauvan Mind you that this PR is depending on a newly introduced external library in 11_2. Fine with me if other stake-holders are OK to go without backport. If no backport is made, one less thing to change underneath in 11_1. |
As I said, I don't expect any effects on L1T, but to be safe with 11_2 this will have to be validated in the future, ideally future Phase2 L1T RelVal and Phase2 HLT RelVal). |
as @jbsauvan indicated, this PR is needed for compatibility with an HGCal geometry bug fix that has not been backported to 11_1_X. (It was deemed too late to include this in HLT TDR production, since most of the production is already finished, and the physics changes are minimal.) Therefore, this PR should not be backported either. |
PR description:
Update module mapping with additional wafers appearing after fix in the definition of valid cells. Fix issue #31506.
Depends on external cms-data/L1Trigger-L1THGCal#20
PR validation:
Tested workflow 23234.0
Removes warning messages.