Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure HGCAL RecHit map is filled also without RECO #31536

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 24, 2020

Conversation

lecriste
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR ensures the HGCAL RecHit map is available in Fireworks, since the Producer introduced by #30061 may not be run (e.g. without RECO). No changes are expected in the output, it restores the correct cmsShow functionality for the 3D RecHit view.

PR validation:

The following Exception thrown by cmsShow is fixed:
The data is registered in the file but is not available for this event
.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31536/18524

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lecriste (Leonardo Cristella) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Fireworks/Calo

@makortel, @alja, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alja this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@lecriste
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented Sep 23, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 23, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented Sep 23, 2020

@silviodonato Do I need to make a new PR for 'master' branch for the change to be included in future upgrade releases?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: a0aa0a6
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0d35cb/9524/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-23-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to Fireworks only changes in PR (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

@silviodonato Do I need to make a new PR for 'master' branch for the change to be included in future upgrade releases?

This PR is already for master. Am I missing something?

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented Sep 23, 2020

@silviodonato I see now and I also see that it will be added to CMSSW_2_0_X releases. Thanks!

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants