Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix failure in L1Trigger/TrackFindingTracklet reported in ASAN #31555

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 25, 2020

Conversation

mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

@mrodozov mrodozov commented Sep 23, 2020

PR description:

Fixes at least one unit test in ASAN IB
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry -> testPhase2PixelNtuple
Using what #30913 suggests

PR validation:

the unit test runs

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31555/18572

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/TrackFindingTracklet

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @benkrikler can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @erikbutz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 23, 2020

Duplicate of #31554 ?
In any case the PR title is misleading as the package involved is actually L1Trigger/TrackFindingTracklet and the unit test just happens to consume it.

@mrodozov mrodozov changed the title Fix ASAN unit test in SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Geometry Fix failure in L1Trigger/TrackFindingTracklet reported in ASAN Sep 23, 2020
@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 23, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: efd2a19

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-23-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bdd106/9526/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

The relvals timed out after 4 hours.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31555/18597

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 24, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #31555 was updated. @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @benkrikler can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: fec21a8
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bdd106/9545/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-23-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bdd106/9545/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2539438
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2539415
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic, @benkrikler can you please review this?
@qliphy , @silviodonato this fixes most of ASAN IBs relvals failures. This change here does not change the ebhaviour of code. It just makes sure that we check for the size before accessing the memory.

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Sep 25, 2020

+1

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Sep 25, 2020

Attn @skinnari @tomalin

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants