New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DD4hep] MTD Shapes Use Cleanup - Use dd4hep::Solid Directly #31577
[DD4hep] MTD Shapes Use Cleanup - Use dd4hep::Solid Directly #31577
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31577/18621
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ianna (Ianna Osborne) for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/MTDCommonData @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
@ianna thanks, the output of the test is unchanged (not seen in the unit test that has a shorter version) |
PR description:
@fabiocos - FYI
FilteredView
itself is not aBox
, but rather aFilteredView::shape
is aBox
This is done in preparation of removing extra classes that duplicate the DD4hep ones:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/DetectorDescription/DDCMS/interface/DDShapes.h
The functionality is unchanged and the comparison tests pass.
PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: