Daughter/Mother Logic instead of SubtractionSolid For ME

[slomeo]

PR description:

This PR followed what I made in PR #31683 . The Subtraction Solids have been replaced by Daughter/Mother logic inside the ME.
This PR is not related to DD4hep migration but it is needed in order to create payloads for Run3 as it has been discussed with @civanch @cvuosalo.

A cross check by @ptcox has been made before submitting this PR.

This PR will close the issue created by @ianna with the PRs #31520 and #31576

PR validation:

1. validation by "cmsShow.exe -c overlaps.fwc --sim-geom-file cmsDD4HepGeom.root --tgeo-name=CMS"
   The attached picture shows, after this PR, no Muon overlaps.

2. validation by "nohup cmsRun SimG4Core/PrintGeomInfo/test/python/g4OverlapCheckDD4Hep_cfg.py >& overlaps.out &"
   Muon's volumes are not present in the overlaps.out file.

3. validation by runTheMatrix.py -l 25202.1 :

25202.1_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15APVSimu_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25 Step0-PASSED Step1-PASSED Step2-PASSED Step3-PASSED - time date Thu Oct 22 14:44:22 2020-date Thu Oct 22 14:23:11 2020; exit: 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 failed

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

nothing special

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31903/19320

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/MuonCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ptcox, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[slomeo]

please @civanch @ianna @cvuosalo perform a "please test"

[slomeo]

@civanch : is it necessary to update the 2021 Scenario (i.e by using dict2021.py and generate2021Geometry) or not?

[civanch]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

• CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-21-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc820: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/10213/console Started: 2020/10/22 17:12

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 39eab56
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b52c58/10213/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-21-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cvuosalo]

The new version of csc.xml needs to be put into the 2021 scenario, or else it will have no effect.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b52c58/10213/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544110
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544084
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
• Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

[civanch]

+1

@cvuosalo , may be we are ready to produce a new scenario?

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1