Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify scale regex in NanoAOD to catch NNLOPS weights #32071

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 10, 2020

Conversation

kdlong
Copy link
Contributor

@kdlong kdlong commented Nov 9, 2020

PR description:

Modifies the scale weights regex in GenWeightsTableProducer to store the NNLOPS weights

These weights corrected the underlying NLO MC to the NNLO accuracy. Without them, the NNLOPS MC is not useful. The weights have the normal format, but with -NNLOPS after them. Just change the regex to consider this as well

PR validation:

Confirmed that it works for a NNLOPS samples and does not affect others. Tested, for example

/WWJTo2L2Nu_NNLOPS_TuneCP5_13TeV-powheg-pythia8/RunIIFall17MiniAODv2-PU2017_12Apr2018_94X_mc2017_realistic_v14-v1/MINIAODSIM

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32071/19710

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @kdlong (Kenneth Long) for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @peruzzim, @swertz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32071/19711

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

Pull request #32071 was updated. @cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again.

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

assign generators

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

New categories assigned: generators

@alberto-sanchez,@SiewYan,@GurpreetSinghChahal,@mkirsano,@agrohsje you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

+1
Tested at: 3ab2a7e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d6ad84/10597/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-09-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d6ad84/10597/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529296
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529267
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

+xpog
no difference in tests as expected

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@agrohsje
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants