Simplification of GEM onlineDQM, backport to CMSSW_11_2_X

[quark2]

PR description:

We've modified the structure of GEM onlineDQM to make it simpler so that developers and shifters of GEM will have more convenience. For developers, we are planning to unify several modules for GEM; onlineDQM, offlineDQM, validation, and it will be the start of the unification work. For shifters, many summarizing plots are added and mainly displayed; the detail plots will be hidden but can be easily found.

And this PR is a backport of #32792.

PR validation:

Test are done and one can check again by runTheMatrix workflows

@jshlee @watson-ij @hyunyong

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @quark2 for CMSSW_11_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/GEM

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@watson-ij this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b492f6/12648/summary.html
COMMIT: 738f7e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2021-02-02-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/32791/12648/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529619
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529590
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
• Checked 151 log files, 37 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

[quark2]

Hi all,

we are supposed to see the updates by this PR in the coming MWGR. Because it has a lot of changes on the GEM onlineDQM, I guess I need to report about this in the coming DQM General meeting (on this Friday). Is it okay? Or do I need to do something more?

[jfernan2]

Hi @quark2
I have included you in the agenda for Friday, thanks!
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1005033/

[quark2]

Hi @jfernan2
Great, thanks!

[jfernan2]

+1
Backport tested at P5 in Online DQM

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1
(already tested at P5 in Online DQM)

[quark2]

Hi @silviodonato,

I also made a PR to the DQM GUI software [1]. Have you also tested?
(I should inform about this PR already in this thread...)

Best regards,
Byeonghak Ko

[1] dmwm/deployment#1028

[jfernan2]

Hi @quark2
We were not aware of this PR, we will test it at P5 right now
I hope you have already tested it on your side, however this would only affect the GUI, the worst thing is some plot not being displayed but no crashes are possible.

[quark2]

Hi @jfernan2,

Sorry for my late notice...
I already tested the PR for GUI and then PRed. Hope the test on your side will be done well.

Best regards,
Byeonghak Ko