New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGCAL] Updates on the RelVal campaign scripts #33131
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33131/21490
|
A new Pull Request was created by @apsallid for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/HGCalValidation @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4e8963/13413/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR updates the HGCAL scripts used for the regular validation campaigns. Specifically,
hgcalPlots.py
.html.py
to use theallticlmulticluster
option among other updates for a nicer webpage environment regarding the material budget comparison plots.PR validation:
We have used these scripts to create the most recent campaign validation reports including the D76 phase 2 campaign for which we studied also material budget plots.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This is not a backport.
@rovere @felicepantaleo @lecriste @ebrondol