New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix G4 logical volumes assignments to production cuts regions with DD4hep #33164
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33164/21552
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ghugo83 for master. It involves the following packages: SimG4Core/Geometry @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
NB: Production cut regions are also identical between DDD and DD4hep. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e4886b/13475/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Fix the remaining discrepancies in G4 logical volumes assignments to production cuts regions with DD4hep.
These discrepancies were stemming from reflected volumes.
Reflected volumes need to benefit from a special treatment in DD4hep.
This is now addressed, and together with #33101:
The production cuts assignments are not absolutely identical between DDD and DD4hep: 839 roots are assigned to production cuts regions.
NB: I also had a branch where a container already containing the G4 reflected volumes is passed to the production cuts constructor. This complicates the interface though, and has absolutely no impact on perf (less than ~0.01 s in initialization loop), hence did not go for that option.
@civanch @cvuosalo @ianna