Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-gex65 Update EB to adjust overlaps: work for DDD, need more work for DD4Hep #33390

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Apr 9, 2021

PR description:

Update EB to adjust overlaps: work for DDD, need more work for DD4Hep

PR validation:

Use runTheMatrix test workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33390/22006

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33390/22007

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/EcalCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vargasa, @rchatter, @argiro, @Martin-Grunewald, @thomreis, @simonepigazzini, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 9, 2021

@cmsbuild Please test

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 9, 2021

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-128882/14151/summary.html
COMMIT: 5960033
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-04-09-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33390/14151/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3075 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2865506
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8429
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2857055
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 37 workflows

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@silviodonato @qliphy @cvuosalo @srimanob Can this be included in the pre6?

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Apr 12, 2021

+1

@bsunanda - I see you have included the 1 mm adjustment for the EcalBarrel mother volume. Thanks!

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ianna Yes - that is important for both DDD and DD4Hep. I am waiting for the fix in dd4hep to check the numbering for EcalBarrel and your new code

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Urgent

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ianna @bsunanda
This PR makes me question how do you plan for the near future development of DDD and DD4Hep for Run-3. As of now, we are validating them, so I expect that we should update both in the same PR, to avoid confusion on which one goes to which release/GT.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Apr 12, 2021 via email

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the clarification @bsunanda . Then what is "need more work for DD4Hep" in the PR title?

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes as mentioned in the SIM meeting, we still have to work on the algorithms for DD4Hep regarding Ecal Barrel and Preshower. Ianna's changes for EB removes overlaps for EB - but has issues for numbering scheme. Ianna is working with DD4Hep team to address this issue.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

Thanks @bsunanda for the clarification.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants