New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-gex65 Update EB to adjust overlaps: work for DDD, need more work for DD4Hep #33390
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33390/22006
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33390/22007
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-128882/14151/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@silviodonato @qliphy @cvuosalo @srimanob Can this be included in the pre6? |
+1 @bsunanda - I see you have included the |
@ianna Yes - that is important for both DDD and DD4Hep. I am waiting for the fix in dd4hep to check the numbering for EcalBarrel and your new code |
Urgent |
When we update a xml file, it automatically updates both DDD and DD4Hep scenario. If we fix an algorithm we see that the same algorithm for the other scenario is also corrected to the best of our knowledge. So each PR takes care of both DDD and DD4Hep
…________________________________
From: Phat Srimanobhas ***@***.***
Sent: 12 April 2021 15:53
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee; Mention
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] Run3-gex65 Update EB to adjust overlaps: work for DDD, need more work for DD4Hep (#33390)
Hi @ianna<https://github.com/ianna> @bsunanda<https://github.com/bsunanda>
This PR makes me question how do you plan for the near future development of DDD and DD4Hep for Run-3. As of now, we are validating them, so I expect that we should update both in the same PR, to avoid confusion on which one goes to which release/GT.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#33390 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGMZOU4TQGNCRHLROMYHXDTIL3OZANCNFSM42VRPF2Q>.
|
Thanks for the clarification @bsunanda . Then what is "need more work for DD4Hep" in the PR title? |
Yes as mentioned in the SIM meeting, we still have to work on the algorithms for DD4Hep regarding Ecal Barrel and Preshower. Ianna's changes for EB removes overlaps for EB - but has issues for numbering scheme. Ianna is working with DD4Hep team to address this issue. |
+Upgrade Thanks @bsunanda for the clarification. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Update EB to adjust overlaps: work for DDD, need more work for DD4Hep
PR validation:
Use runTheMatrix test workflows
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special