Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added AVE_10 and AVE_20 13 TeV pu scenarios #3346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 20, 2014
Merged

added AVE_10 and AVE_20 13 TeV pu scenarios #3346

merged 1 commit into from Apr 20, 2014

Conversation

lveldere
Copy link
Contributor

added AVE_10 and AVE_20 13 TeV pu scenarios for FastSim
both scenarios tested with 100 events, checked true and observed number of pu interactions.

@lveldere
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @lveldere for CMSSW_7_1_X.

added AVE_10 and AVE_20 13 TeV pu scenarios

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/StandardSequences
FastSimulation/PileUpProducer

@nclopezo, @vlimant, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @Degano, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @cerati, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2014
added AVE_10 and AVE_20 13 TeV pu scenarios
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit d3e7d06 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Apr 20, 2014
@lveldere lveldere deleted the e13TeV_pu_scenarios branch January 20, 2015 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants